Your agent writes code, Kerno runs integration tests against your real stack, your agent fixes what it broke. The loop closes before code leaves your machine.
Fewer broken builds reach CI because behavioral issues are caught locally. CI still runs your full pipeline (linting, security scans, unit tests, deploys), but it stops being the first place you find out something broke.
QA quality no longer varies by who prompted the agent or who remembered to run which tests. Kerno validates consistently on every code change.


No. CI handles your full pipeline: unit tests, linting, security, builds, and deployments. Kerno adds behavioral validation that runs locally during development and optionally in CI. They're complementary.
Speed and context. In CI, validation results come minutes later and your agent has moved on. Locally, results come in seconds and your agent fixes what it broke in the same session. The local loop is where agentic coding gets its leverage.
Yes. Kerno runs locally during development and integrates into CI for team-wide validation. It works alongside whatever CI provider you use.
The opposite. Each test run takes seconds. Fewer broken builds reach CI, so your team spends less time debugging post-merge failures.
Kerno generates and maintains its own behavioral scenarios. It discovers endpoints via SCIP indexing, generates test scenarios covering functional workflows, contracts, error handling, auth, and edge cases, and keeps them in sync as your code evolves. CI runs whatever tests you've written. They don't overlap.