Uou need to test what your users see in the browser: page loads, interactions, navigation flows, visual rendering, and cross-browser compatibility.
You use AI coding agents to write backend code and want automated behavioral validation against your real local infrastructure before code hits CI.
you want full-stack coverage. Playwright handles the browser layer, and Kerno handles the backend layer. Together, they cover both sides of your stack.


Playwright can make HTTP calls via APIRequestContext, but it doesn't manage backend infrastructure, generate integration tests from your codebase, or maintain regression baselines. Kerno automates that entire API testing lifecycle.
Playwright's Test Agents generate spec files for browser interactions. Backend API coverage still requires you to decide what to test and when to update. Kerno indexes your codebase, discovers endpoints, and generates integration test scenarios automatically.
They test different layers. Playwright tests browser behavior. Kerno tests backend APIs: do your endpoints return the right data, handle errors correctly, and maintain their contracts when code changes. Good E2E coverage doesn't tell you whether a backend refactor broke an API contract that no UI test exercises.
No. Kerno handles backend API testing and regression detection against real infrastructure. For frontend and E2E browser testing, use Playwright.
Yes. Both expose MCP servers. Use Kerno's MCP for backend API testing and Playwright's MCP for browser automation. They serve different purposes in the same workflow.